<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1086" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1086</id>
  <updated>2013-06-19T22:19:20Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-06-19T22:19:20Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The Adelaide Hills Face Zone as a Cultural Landscape. [abstract].</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1570" />
    <author>
      <name>Smith, Pamela Alethea</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Piddock, Susan</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Pate, Frank Donald</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1570</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:31Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Adelaide Hills Face Zone as a Cultural Landscape. [abstract].
Authors: Smith, Pamela Alethea; Piddock, Susan; Pate, Frank Donald
Abstract: Landscape archaeology is a recent approach employed in historical and indigenous archaeology that addresses the interaction of cultural and environmental variables associated with human landscape use (Yamin and Bescherer 1996; David and Lourandos 1999). This theoretical paradigm was derived from earlier systems-based approaches to human landscape use developed in relation to settlement pattern and human ecology studies (Clark 1952; Willey 1953, 1956; Steward 1955). Whereas many earlier approaches to human landscape use emphasised the natural environment as a prime mover, landscape archaeology focuses on the strong interactions between culture (i.e. learned behaviour, norms) and natural environments. In relation to historical archaeology, the cultural “baggage” that colonists bring with them has a major impact on how they view, interpret, and use new territories. After three years of archaeological and historical studies it is argued that Adelaide’s Hills Face Zone is one of the best preserved relict landscapes representing the era of European/English expansion and colonisation during the eighteen and nineteenth centuries.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cultural landscapes of a tourism destination: South Australia's Barossa Valley. [abstract].</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1569" />
    <author>
      <name>Leader-Elliott, Lynette Frances</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1569</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:36Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Cultural landscapes of a tourism destination: South Australia's Barossa Valley. [abstract].
Authors: Leader-Elliott, Lynette Frances
Abstract: Alternative ways in which the cultural landscape of South Australia’s Barossa Valley is represented are examined briefly to demonstrate the difference in cultural landscape representations in recent tourism marketing print materials of the region, and in a large-scale textile artwork completed by a group of thirty nine Barossa women in 1999. The paper will compare cultural landscape elements included in this piece of community art work with the types of images included in recent tourism promotional material for the Barossa region.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>"A projection part of the main": an Elliston palimpsest. [abstract].</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1568" />
    <author>
      <name>Hosking, Rick</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1568</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:36Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: "A projection part of the main": an Elliston palimpsest. [abstract].
Authors: Hosking, Rick
Abstract: This paper considers a number of ways of reading a particular cultural land/seascape at Elliston, on South Australia’s west coast. At first glance it may surprise some to hear a clifftop with a clearly defined track described as cultural, because cultural landscapes are usually regarded as places that live in the imaginations of a community, as repositories of shared notions about cultural value. They are usually both sites and sights. Cultural landscapes are usually domesticated in some way, reconstructed by human intervention over considerable periods of time as a consequence of complex human landuse and lived practices, and often representing an agrarian or pastoral ideal that summons up ideas of a golden age. Such landscapes usually reveal evidence of human intervention shaped not only by cultural practice but also by aesthetic judgment, and are often designed to maintain a way of life by conserving specific features of that landscape. How can a cliff in a littoral zone, a ‘projecting part of the main’, reveal evidence of human intervention, where any evidence of occupation is hard to find?</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Placing the post in the landscape of colonial memories: revisiting the memory of a colonial frontier. [abstract].</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1567" />
    <author>
      <name>Haggis, Jane</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1567</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:38Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Placing the post in the landscape of colonial memories: revisiting the memory of a colonial frontier. [abstract].
Authors: Haggis, Jane
Abstract: Paul Fox closes his exploration of the institutionalisation of memory within museums with the question 'do Australians inhabit a postcolonial world or a landscape of colonial memories?' [Fox, 1992, 317] The question forms for him out of an analysis&#xD;
of the ways in which the orderings of aboriginality and space of the colonial museum continued to haunt Australian cultural imaginaries in the early 1990s. Fox traces how colonial museums ordered their knowledge always in reference to the imperial centre, accomplishing a kind of double colonialism – reinforcing 'the European acquisition of space' while ensuring that, for the 'former peripheral city of empire ... memory exists in and belongs to a system of knowledge created elsewhere' [ibid, pp. 308-9]. It seems to me Fox posed his question to invite a response affirming the colonial quality&#xD;
of Australian memory. However, considering his question in 2005, ‘post’ the debates&#xD;
over race, reconciliation, and history that dominated the turn of century, elicits a more uncertain response in me. This paper explores these questions through a study of the social memory of a colonial frontier in the southeast of South Australia. Drawing on Healy’s conception of social memory as a 'network of performances' in which 'relationships between past and present are performed' (1995, p. 5) the paper focuses on the ways in which one colonial ‘memory’ of the frontier, Mrs Christina Smith’s book "The Booandik&#xD;
Tribe of South Australian Aborigines: a Sketch of their Habits, Customs, Legends,&#xD;
and Language", first published in 1880, is performed in two contemporary renderings&#xD;
of the social memory of colonialism: the Lady Nelson Discovery Centre, in Mount&#xD;
Gambier, South Australia, and the writings of Mrs Heather Carthew, great granddaughter of Mrs Smith.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

