<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection: In the Wars: The Trials of Middle Australia</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1194" />
  <subtitle>In the Wars: The Trials of Middle Australia</subtitle>
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1194</id>
  <updated>2013-06-19T10:24:22Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-06-19T10:24:22Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Rampaging Rationalism. "Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason" by Val Plumwood. [review]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1233" />
    <author>
      <name>Thompson, Janna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1233</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:14Z</updated>
    <published>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Rampaging Rationalism. "Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason" by Val Plumwood. [review]
Authors: Thompson, Janna
Abstract: Val Plumwood, the author of a highly praised defence of eco-feminism, "Feminism and the Mastery of Nature", presents in this book a critique of 'rationalist culture' and explains why it harms nature as well as so many people. Plumwood’s criticism of rationalism centres on the thesis she advanced in her earlier book. From Plato onward, it has been regarded as rational to divide the world into polarised and homogeneous conceptual categories (reason/emotion, culture/nature, spirit/matter, masculine/feminine) and to regard things falling under the first term of these dichotomies as superior to those belonging to the second. This way of thinking, Plumwood argues, has given rationalists a licence to ignore the needs of beings deemed to be inferior - to dominate and exploit them for the sake of their 'superiors'. In particular, it has been used to justify the domination of nature and of women.</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Phantom of the Prison. "Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons From Five Countries" by Julian V. Roberts et al. [review]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1232" />
    <author>
      <name>Hogg, Russell</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1232</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:17Z</updated>
    <published>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Phantom of the Prison. "Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons From Five Countries" by Julian V. Roberts et al. [review]
Authors: Hogg, Russell
Abstract: This new book provides a valuable analysis of the recent trend toward punitive justice and the populist politics that has nurtured it in five English-speaking countries: the USA, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. It describes the growing resort to more deeply punitive sentencing measures (such as mandatory sentencing laws) and devotes separate chapters to each of three areas in which penal populist politics have been particularly evident: juveniles, drugs and sex offenders (especially paedophiles).</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Doctorates in Mateyness. "HIH: This Inside Story of Australia's Biggest Corporate Collapse" by Mark Westfield. [review]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1231" />
    <author>
      <name>Haigh, Gideon</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1231</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:13Z</updated>
    <published>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Doctorates in Mateyness. "HIH: This Inside Story of Australia's Biggest Corporate Collapse" by Mark Westfield. [review]
Authors: Haigh, Gideon
Abstract: If you like business bodice-rippers, these are blissful days. After the host of books that emerged from the dotcom Götterdämmerung, another wave of cautionary tales has hit the shelves. I reached for Mark Westfield’s "HIH" after reading my third book about Enron, Mimi Swartz’s "Power Failure", and was struck at once by a casual coincidence: that both Enron's Ken Lay and HIH’s Ray Williams insisted on being referred to as 'Doctor'. In Lay's case, this was on account of his PhD in economics. Williams laid rather flimsier claim to his honorific, after Monash University rewarded him for various endowments with an honorary doctorate in laws in 1999.</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Degrees in Inequality. "Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia" by Richard Teese and John Polesel. [review]</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1230" />
    <author>
      <name>Snyder, Ilana</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1230</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:59:14Z</updated>
    <published>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Degrees in Inequality. "Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia" by Richard Teese and John Polesel. [review]
Authors: Snyder, Ilana
Abstract: This book has a number of admirable qualities. In times when open subscription to a social justice agenda runs the risk of ridicule, it is a brave book. It does not shy away from identifying the universities - specifically, the sandstones - as integral to any explanation of why Australian secondary education is inequitable. And both authors work in one: the University of Melbourne. The book also builds a compelling case for curriculum and structural reform. Through the careful analysis of issues such as retention and dropout rates, the relation between poverty and achievement, and between gender and achievement, it argues potently that our education system is disturbingly riven by persistent inequalities of opportunity.</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

