<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26003" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26003</id>
  <updated>2013-05-20T02:50:48Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-20T02:50:48Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>The relationship between sociology and cognate disciplines: law</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26059" />
    <author>
      <name>Roach Anleu, Sharyn Leanne</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Mack, Kathleen Margaret</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26059</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T02:07:57Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The relationship between sociology and cognate disciplines: law
Authors: Roach Anleu, Sharyn Leanne; Mack, Kathleen Margaret
Abstract: This paper considers the relationship between sociology and law, as a cognate&#xD;
discipline, through a discussion of social research into legal processes and settings,&#xD;
sometimes referred to as empirical socio-legal research. It first addresses the different&#xD;
meanings of research for social scientists and for lawyers, then investigates some&#xD;
particular challenges for cross/inter/multidisciplinary socio-legal research, and&#xD;
identifies the growing demands for empirical analyses of law and legal processes.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Camouflage: how the visual arts and sociology make sense of the military</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26058" />
    <author>
      <name>Wadham, Benjamin Allan</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Hamilton, Amy Ruth</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26058</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T02:07:49Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Camouflage: how the visual arts and sociology make sense of the military
Authors: Wadham, Benjamin Allan; Hamilton, Amy Ruth
Abstract: The military is the core institution of state sanctioned violence in Western liberal&#xD;
democracies. In the last decade or so the role of the military has changed and&#xD;
militarism has become an increasingly conspicuous aspect of public life. The idea of&#xD;
camouflage is used and developed to explore how collaboration between the visual&#xD;
arts and sociology can be used to denaturalise the taken-for-granted assumptions and&#xD;
beliefs about the military in Australian society. Camouflage is explained in its&#xD;
military utility, its psychological concept (Gestalt theory) the art camouflage&#xD;
movement and their developed techniques (eg Cubism, Dadaism), and in terms of&#xD;
deconstruction or sociological critique as a tool for making social relations that are&#xD;
culturally camouflaged visible.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reworking the sociology of trust: making a semantic distinction between trust and dependence</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26057" />
    <author>
      <name>Meyer, Samantha B</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Ward, Paul Russell</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26057</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T02:07:54Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Reworking the sociology of trust: making a semantic distinction between trust and dependence
Authors: Meyer, Samantha B; Ward, Paul Russell
Abstract: Trust, as a sociological construct, has become increasingly important in recent times&#xD;
but an agreed definition is yet to be found. A potentially useful way of ‘defining’ trust&#xD;
is by distinguishing it from other semantically similar concepts. Niklas Luhmann has&#xD;
provided semantic distinctions between trust and familiarity, and trust and confidence.&#xD;
The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence of a further semantic&#xD;
distinction between trust and dependence. This distinction allows us to further define&#xD;
trust and also to investigate the difference between ‘trust’ and ‘dependence’.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

