<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8139" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8139</id>
  <updated>2013-06-07T17:09:40Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-06-07T17:09:40Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Σκιές, αντικατοπτρισμοί και αναδίπλωση: Η μυθοπλαστική “περιπέτεια” του Στέλιου Ξεφλούδα</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8175" />
    <author>
      <name>Palaktsoglou, Maria</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8175</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:36:51Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Σκιές, αντικατοπτρισμοί και αναδίπλωση: Η μυθοπλαστική “περιπέτεια” του Στέλιου Ξεφλούδα
Authors: Palaktsoglou, Maria
Abstract: Please note: This article is in Greek. In this paper I will examine the “adventures” on narrative structure of Stelios Xefloudas. Stelios Xefloudas, a Greek writer of the Generation of the thirties was educated in both Greece and France and was an advocate of interior monologue and innovative novel in his country. During the thirties he wrote four innovative novels: Τα Τετράδια του Παύλου Φωτεινού (1930), Εσωτερική Συμφωνία (1932), Εύα (1934) and Στο Φως του Λευκού Αγγέλου (1936). These four novels are written with the technique of interior monologue and they explore themes such as the recording of the unconscious process, the dreamy state of self and escapism. Through these novels we’ll examine Xefloudas’ capacity in “constructing” female characters. For the writer it seems that character “construction” is a long and hard process regulated by his views on fiction as well as his personal limitations or impediments on narrative structure.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Πεντζίκης: Αγκαζέ</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8174" />
    <author>
      <name>Tsianikas, Michael</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8174</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:26:58Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Πεντζίκης: Αγκαζέ
Authors: Tsianikas, Michael
Abstract: Please note: This article is in Greek. In this paper which is a chapter of a forthcoming book publication on the literary work of N. G. Pentzikis, I examine the notion of “engagement”. I begin with a text published in the journal Paramilito in which we are informed that in 1941 the close circle of Pentzikis’ friends were very upset because when walking through the city of Thessaloniki the author wanted to walk linked together arm to arm. They expressed their objection but Pentzikis insisted this attitude has nothing to do with an accepted or unaccepted social practice but was a profound engagement to become united (omoousios) with the other persons. The author’s attitude of course is identical towards not only the physical presence of others, but also to the function of language, narrative structures, aesthetical approach, social ideologies, myths and religion. To put it in other words, Pentzikis abandons himself in the “hands” of things, events and situations that occur. On the creative level someone can test this engagement in every single page of his writings but in this paper I examine the above through some concrete themes e.g. “icon”, “surface”, “scheme” “hero” and so on. Another important question that arises here is the issue of continuity/discontinuity in the narrative construction of writing text. Pentzikis always tries to address this issue by engaging himself in an unstoppable multitude of narrations, from where the most foreign and distant elements are fusing together. At the end of the paper I refer to a discursive engagement between Pentzikis and George Seferis from where someone can understand that their fundamental differences produce two completely opposite aesthetic directions. We now know that for a variety of reasons over the last fifty years George Seferis’ vision of dis-engagement has dominated the Greek intellectual life.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Το απομακρυσμένο “Σήμερα” στην πεζογραφία της περιόδου 1960–1975</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8173" />
    <author>
      <name>Spilias, Thanasis</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8173</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:27:01Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Το απομακρυσμένο “Σήμερα” στην πεζογραφία της περιόδου 1960–1975
Authors: Spilias, Thanasis
Abstract: Please note: This article is in Greek. With regard to thematic approaches, what concerns writers of the period 1960-1975 and what motivates them most is mainly the present. The past appears to occupy them very little. And when it does, it is, in essence, a “distant present”. I support this claim by specific reference to, and analyses of R. Roufos’s novel Οι Γραικύλοι and M. Koumandareas’s short story Τα Μηχανάκια. I contend that though both of these writers talk about the past, what they want to project is their contemporary historic reality.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Η έννοια του Άλλου στο έργο της Μιμίκας Κρανάκη Φιλέλληνες: 24 γράμματα μιας Οδύσσειας</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8172" />
    <author>
      <name>Nazou, Panayiota</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8172</id>
    <updated>2013-05-13T01:36:56Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Η έννοια του Άλλου στο έργο της Μιμίκας Κρανάκη Φιλέλληνες: 24 γράμματα μιας Οδύσσειας
Authors: Nazou, Panayiota
Abstract: Please note: This article is in Greek. In this paper we analyse the notion of the Other and Otherness within networks of power relations, as depicted in Mimika Kranaki’s novel "Philhellenes: 24 letters of an Odyssey". We focus on the representational strategies of conscious and unconscious conflicts, as manifested in&#xD;
situations of cultural overlapping and existential osmosis. In a revealing manner, Kranaki’s novel illustrates the ambivalent relations between the Same and the Other and, simultaneously, their very complementarity.&#xD;
Beyond its painful process, according to Kranaki, the encounter with the Other is an ascesis of Self-transcendence, and expansion of the borders of the essential human being. Ultimately the encounter with the Other not only expands the limits of the Self but also establishes its specific topos in history.</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

