<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25871">
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25871</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26384" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26383" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26381" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-25T02:21:49Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26384">
    <title>Gender pay equity in Australia: where are we now and where are we heading?</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26384</link>
    <description>Title: Gender pay equity in Australia: where are we now and where are we heading?
Authors: Todd, P; Preston, A
Abstract: In this article we consider the current trends in gender pay equity in Australia,&#xD;
identifying the lack of improvement, and indeed the recent deterioration, in the&#xD;
national gender wage ratio. We analyse the gender wage gap by industry, State,&#xD;
and labour force status and consider developments in the regulatory sphere and&#xD;
social context which have the potential to have an impact on gender pay equity.&#xD;
We conclude with a discussion of the future prospects for the gender wage gap.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26383">
    <title>Private retirement savings in Australia: current policy initiatives and gender equity implications</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26383</link>
    <description>Title: Private retirement savings in Australia: current policy initiatives and gender equity implications
Authors: Jefferson, T
Abstract: This article assesses the implications for gender equity of three recent policy&#xD;
initiatives on superannuation in Australia: (i) government co-contributions&#xD;
for low-income earners; (ii) an increase in compulsory superannuation&#xD;
contributions from 9 to 12 per cent; and (iii) the pending introduction of&#xD;
‘MySuper’ accounts, specifically designed for those who do not take an active&#xD;
interest in their superannuation accumulation. Implications for gendered&#xD;
patterns of superannuation coverage and superannuation accumulations&#xD;
are considered. The conclusion is that while the first measure may have some&#xD;
beneficial outcomes in terms of gendered patterns of accumulation, none&#xD;
of the three measures appears to deal with issues associated with gendered&#xD;
patterns of access to occupational superannuation.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382">
    <title>Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility?</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382</link>
    <description>Title: Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility?
Authors: Heron, A; Charlesworth, S
Abstract: Since the Labor Government’s election in 2007, debate around working-time&#xD;
flexibility has continued unabated. Employers argue that increasing employer-orientated&#xD;
flexibility through changes to minimum working-time standards&#xD;
and individual flexibility agreements is the path to enhanced productivity&#xD;
and a more effective economy. Unions and others have focused on the need&#xD;
for greater employee-orientated flexibility to facilitate combining work and&#xD;
care. However, on neither side of the debate has much attention been paid&#xD;
to basic principles that might inform working-time regulation in ways that&#xD;
would enable individual workers to manage their work and care responsibilities&#xD;
better and deliver a more sustainable and gender-equitable economy. The&#xD;
article outlines recent contestation around flexibility and argues that without&#xD;
ensuring adequate minimum working-time standards for all workers, the&#xD;
gendered divide around work and care will continue to be reinforced.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26381">
    <title>Maternal employment and childcare in Australia: achievements and barriers to satisfying employment</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26381</link>
    <description>Title: Maternal employment and childcare in Australia: achievements and barriers to satisfying employment
Authors: Boyd, W
Abstract: The Australian Government has begun effecting significant changes that&#xD;
focus on the provision of high-quality, accessible early-childhood education&#xD;
and care (ECEC). This approach is twofold: it recognises the continual increase&#xD;
of maternal employment and its value to the productivity of Australia, and&#xD;
the importance of the early years of life. This article examines the significant&#xD;
changes made to ECEC policy and highlights some key areas of concern&#xD;
for parents, and mothers in particular, as they make plans for entering (or&#xD;
re-entering) the workforce. These areas of concern are likely to have an impact&#xD;
upon children, families, and the productivity agenda.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

