http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26003 2013-05-23T20:09:41Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26059 Title: The relationship between sociology and cognate disciplines: law Authors: Roach Anleu, Sharyn Leanne; Mack, Kathleen Margaret Abstract: This paper considers the relationship between sociology and law, as a cognate discipline, through a discussion of social research into legal processes and settings, sometimes referred to as empirical socio-legal research. It first addresses the different meanings of research for social scientists and for lawyers, then investigates some particular challenges for cross/inter/multidisciplinary socio-legal research, and identifies the growing demands for empirical analyses of law and legal processes. 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26058 Title: Camouflage: how the visual arts and sociology make sense of the military Authors: Wadham, Benjamin Allan; Hamilton, Amy Ruth Abstract: The military is the core institution of state sanctioned violence in Western liberal democracies. In the last decade or so the role of the military has changed and militarism has become an increasingly conspicuous aspect of public life. The idea of camouflage is used and developed to explore how collaboration between the visual arts and sociology can be used to denaturalise the taken-for-granted assumptions and beliefs about the military in Australian society. Camouflage is explained in its military utility, its psychological concept (Gestalt theory) the art camouflage movement and their developed techniques (eg Cubism, Dadaism), and in terms of deconstruction or sociological critique as a tool for making social relations that are culturally camouflaged visible. 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26057 Title: Reworking the sociology of trust: making a semantic distinction between trust and dependence Authors: Meyer, Samantha B; Ward, Paul Russell Abstract: Trust, as a sociological construct, has become increasingly important in recent times but an agreed definition is yet to be found. A potentially useful way of ‘defining’ trust is by distinguishing it from other semantically similar concepts. Niklas Luhmann has provided semantic distinctions between trust and familiarity, and trust and confidence. The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence of a further semantic distinction between trust and dependence. This distinction allows us to further define trust and also to investigate the difference between ‘trust’ and ‘dependence’. 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z