http://hdl.handle.net/2328/102 Sat, 18 May 2013 13:35:44 GMT 2013-05-18T13:35:44Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25575 Title: William Shakespeare: Othello Authors: Daalder, Joost Abstract: Othello is not often thought of as a play primarily concerned with madness, yet that is what it is. Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25575 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25211 Title: The Text of “King Lear” 2.2.136-145 in the ‘Arden 3’ Edition Authors: Daalder, Joost Abstract: This paper considers the nature of R. A. Foakes's approach to editing 'King Lear', and how the latest Arden edition may be improved so as to bring it closer to what Shakespeare is likely to have written. Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/25211 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/805 Title: Review of "Puritans and Libertines: Anglo-French Literary Relations in the Reformation" by Richmond Authors: Daalder, Joost Abstract: Review of H.M. Richmond's book "Puritans and Libertines: Anglo-French Literary Relations in the Reformation" (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1981). This book, according to Daalder, is a disconcertingly uneven one, not least because its virtues and vices are not immediately easy to define. Sun, 01 Jan 1984 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/805 1984-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/661 Title: Shakespeare's "King Lear", 4.2.47-51 Authors: Daalder, Joost Abstract: Two versions of the IV.ii.47-51 passage are quoted from Alexander's and Foakes's editions because the editorial punctuation of the two texts clearly reflects two quite different interpretations of the passage: in the first, there is no punctuation mark after "come" in line 3, whereas in the second, there is. If we carefully reflect on the two seeming interpretations, it becomes apparent that only one of them actually makes sense, and the other one must be discarded. Daalder argues that, as a result, there should be no punctuation mark after come. Editors who add a punctuation mark as though the First Quarto has wrongly omitted it are in error, and they obscure the sense of the passage. Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/661 2001-01-01T00:00:00Z