http://hdl.handle.net/2328/669 Sun, 26 May 2013 05:54:13 GMT 2013-05-26T05:54:13Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/902 Title: Political arithmetik: accounting for irony in Swift's "A Modest Proposal" Authors: Phiddian, Robert Andrew Abstract: Writing as a literary critic and literary historian rather than as a professional or academic accountant, Phiddian proposes to highlight two ways by which accountants might resist the rhetorical power of positive accounting theory to give the impression that it operates with scientific neutrality. First, by attending to satirical modes of writing that use parody to unsettle the assumptions of accounting discourse; secondly, by adopting and illustrating a sceptical mode of interpretation based on a model of blindness and insight very commonly employed in current literary theory. Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/902 1996-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/808 Title: Review of "Swift as Nemesis: Modernity and Its Satirist" by Boyle Authors: Phiddian, Robert Andrew Abstract: Phiddian's review of Frank Boyle's book "Swift as Nemesis" Modernity and Its Satirist" (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000). Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/808 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/2328/746 Title: Have you eaten yet? The reader in "A Modest Proposal" Authors: Phiddian, Robert Andrew Abstract: In Swift's "A Modest Proposal", the Proposer discusses recipes for stewed baby. If Swift's plan for the readers was first to trick us into temporary assent to the proposal, and then to follow this with an instructive catharsis when we recognise our error and revise our view of the political situation, it would seem that Defoe was a more skillful parodic ironist than he. The "Modest Proposal" is simply too aggressively alienating to be successful as a hoax, and Phiddian suggests that we should not try to read it that way. The text does not make a serious attempt to lull us into a false sense of security. Rather, it attacks us; everywhere it makes us vulnerable. We are exposed to the vicissitudes of moral choice, stretched between the polar claims to authority made, on the one hand, by the delinquent and lunatic Proposer, and, on the other, by an angry but fugitive Swift. What Phiddian aims to do in this essay is to look carefully at how we readers are positioned in the text and in relation to these polar authorities. Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2328/746 1996-01-01T00:00:00Z