Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons

Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
Legal Studies >
Francis Regan >
Published Works  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1030

Title: Rolls Royce or Rundown 1970s Kingswood? Australia's legal aid in comparative perspective.
Authors: Regan, Francis
Keywords: Legal Studies
Legal Aid
Legal Profession
Francis Regan
Issue Date: 1997
Publisher: Law Faculty, Monash University, Clayton, Vic
Citation: Regan, F. 1997. Rolls Royce or Rundown 1970s Kingswood? Australia's legal aid in comparative perspective, 'Alternative Law Journal', vol.22, no.5, 225-228.
Abstract: The Commonwealth Attorney-General, Daryl Williams’ comment earlier this year that Australia’s legal aid was a ‘Rolls Royce’ scheme was surprisingly ill informed and created an unfortunate perception that legal aid commissions (LACs) were well funded but mismanaged, bloated and wasting public money. The comment was made in order to support the 1996 Budget decision to cut Commonwealth funding to legal aid but as I demonstrate below, it showed a surprising lack of knowledge about Australia’s legal aid scheme. In particular, Williams ignored the evidence demonstrating that Australia’s legal aid is, by comparison with similar large, publicly funded schemes, one of the meanest in the western world. In this article I explore some context issues which may help explain why Williams cut legal aid and then I examine Australia’s scheme in a comparative perspective.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1030
ISSN: 1037-969X
Appears in Collections:Published Works

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Francis Regan Legal Aid Comparative.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback