Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons
 

Flinders Academic Commons >
Research Publications >
ERA 2010 >
07 - Biomedical and Clinical Research >
1103 - Clinical Sciences >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/10536

Title: Measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM)
Authors: Phillips, Paddy Andrew
Bond, Malcolm James
Sladek, Ruth
Issue Date: 2008
Citation: Sladek, R., Phillips, P.A., & Bond, M.J., 2008. Measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM). BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8(20).
Abstract: Background Understanding how doctors think may inform both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Developing such an understanding requires valid and reliable measurement tools. We examined the measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM), designed to tap this domain with specific reference to medicine, but with previously questionable measurement properties. Methods First year postgraduate entry medical students at Flinders University, and trainees (postgraduate doctors in any specialty) and consultants (N = 348) based at two teaching hospitals in Adelaide, Australia, completed the ICBM and a questionnaire measuring thinking styles (Rational Experiential Inventory). Results Questions with the lowest item-total correlation were deleted from the original 22 item ICBM, although the resultant 17 item scale only marginally improved internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.61 compared with 0.57). A factor analysis identified two scales, both achieving only α = 0.58. Construct validity was assessed by correlating Rational Experiential Inventory scores with the ICBM, with some positive correlations noted for students only, suggesting that those who are naïve to the knowledge base required to "successfully" respond to the ICBM may profit by a thinking style in tune with logical reasoning. Conclusion The ICBM failed to demonstrate adequate content validity, internal consistency and construct validity. It is unlikely that improvements can be achieved without considered attention to both the audience for which it is designed and its item content. The latter may need to involve both removal of some items deemed to measure multiple biases and the addition of new items in the attempt to survey the range of biases that may compromise medical decision making.
Description: © 2008 Sladek et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/10536
ISSN: 1472-6947
Appears in Collections:1103 - Clinical Sciences
1199 - Other Medical and Health Sciences
1103 - Clinical Sciences

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2006009013.pdf258.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback