Flinders Academic Commons >
Research Publications >
ERA 2010 >
04 - Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences >
1302 - Curriculum and Pedagogy >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Learning to prescribe - pharmacists'
experiences of supplementary prescribing training in England|
|Authors: ||Bissell, Paul|
Ward, Paul Russell
|Issue Date: ||2008|
|Citation: ||Cooper, R., Lymn, J., Anderson, C.,
Avery, T., Bissell, P., Guillaume, L., Hutchinson, A., Murphy, E., Ratcliffe, J., &
Ward, P.R., 2008. Learning to prescribe - pharmacists' experiences of supplementary
prescribing training in England. BMC Medical Education, 8, 57-64.|
The introduction of non-medical prescribing for professions such as pharmacy and nursing in recent years offers additional responsibilities and opportunities but attendant training issues. In the UK and in contrast to some international models, becoming a non-medical prescriber involves the completion of an accredited training course offered by many higher education institutions, where the skills and knowledge necessary for prescribing are learnt. Aims: to explore pharmacists' perceptions and experiences of learning to prescribe on supplementary prescribing (SP) courses, particularly in relation to inter-professional learning, course content and subsequent use of prescribing in practice.
A postal questionnaire survey was sent to all 808 SP registered pharmacists in England in April 2007, exploring demographic, training, prescribing, safety culture and general perceptions of SP.
After one follow-up, 411 (51%) of pharmacists responded. 82% agreed SP training was useful, 58% agreed courses provided appropriate knowledge and 62% agreed that the necessary prescribing skills were gained. Clinical examination, consultation skills training and practical experience with doctors were valued highly; pharmacology training and some aspects of course delivery were criticised. Mixed views on inter-professional learning were reported – insights into other professions being valued but knowledge and skills differences considered problematic. 67% believed SP and recent independent prescribing (IP) should be taught together, with more diagnostic training wanted; few pharmacists trained in IP, but many were training or intending to train. There was no association between pharmacists' attitudes towards prescribing training and when they undertook training between 2004 and 2007 but earlier cohorts were more likely to be using supplementary prescribing in practice.
Pharmacists appeared to value their SP training and suggested improvements that could inform future courses. The benefits of inter-professional learning, however, may conflict with providing profession-specific training. SP training may be perceived to be an instrumental 'stepping stone' in pharmacists' professional project of gaining full IP status.|
|Description: ||© 2008 Cooper et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.|
|Appears in Collections:||1117 - Public Health and Health Services|
Public Health - Collected Works
1302 - Curriculum and Pedagogy
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.