Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons
 

Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
School of Medicine >
Palliative and Supportive Services >
Amy Abernethy >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1600

Title: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of sustained release morphine for the management of refractory dyspnoea.
Authors: Abernethy, Amy Pickar
Currow, David Christopher
Frith, David
Fazekas, Belinda Susan
McHugh, Annie
Bui, Chuong
Keywords: Dyspnea
Morphine
Narcotics
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Issue Date: Sep-2003
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group - http://bjo.bmjjournals.com/
Citation: Abernethy, A.P. Currow, D.C. Frith, D. Fazekas, B. McHugh, A. Bui, C. 2003 Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of sustained release morphine for the management of refractory dyspnoea. 'BMJ' Vol. 327, No. 7414, 523-8
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral morphine in relieving the sensation of breathlessness in patients in whom the underlying aetiology is maximally treated. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover study. SETTING: Four outpatient clinics at a hospital in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 48 participants who had not previously been treated with opioids (mean age 76, SD 5) with predominantly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (42, 88%) were randomised to four days of 20 mg oral morphine with sustained release followed by four days of identically formulated placebo, or vice versa. Laxatives were provided as needed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dyspnoea in the morning and evening as shown on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, quality of sleep, wellbeing, performance on physical exertion, and side effects as measured at the end of the four day treatment period. RESULTS: 38 participants completed the study; three withdrew because of definite and two because of possible side effects of morphine (nausea, vomiting, and sedation). Participants reported significantly different dyspnoea scores when treated with morphine: an improvement of 6.6 mm (95% confidence interval 1.6 mm to 11.6 mm) in the morning and of 9.5 mm (3.0 mm to 16.1 mm) in the evening (P = 0.011 and P = 0.006, respectively). During the period in which they were taking morphine participants also reported better sleep (P = 0.039). More participants reported distressing constipation while taking morphine (9 v 1, P = 0.021) in spite of using laxatives. All other side effects were not significantly worse with morphine, although the study was not powered to address side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained release, oral morphine at low dosage provides significant symptomatic improvement in refractory dyspnoea in the community setting.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1600
ISSN: 1468-5833
Appears in Collections:Amy Abernethy
David Currow

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Abernethy & Currow 32774142003 with front page.pdf328.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback