Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons
 

Flinders Academic Commons >
eJournals >
Flinders Journal of Law Reform >
April 2008 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1837

Title: It’s all about risk, isn’t it? Science, politics, public opinion and regulatory reform
Authors: Haines, Fiona
Sutton, Adam
Platania-Phung, Chris
Keywords: Regulatory burden
Issue Date: Apr-2008
Publisher: Flinders University School of Law
Citation: Haines, F. Sutton, A. & Platania-Phung, C. "It’s all about risk, isn’t it? Science, politics, public opinion and regulatory reform" 10 FJLR 435
Abstract: Like most Western democracies, Australia has seen constant business complaints about the regulatory burden and the need for reform. Governments have been sympathetic to these concerns and initiated numerous enquiries into ways to reduce red tape. One, published by the Regulation Taskforce in 2006, argues that a key problem is that Australians are becoming ‘risk averse’. Drawing on research into the regulatory aftermath of major disasters, this paper argues that the Taskforce’s approach is over-simplistic. Risk has at least three dimensions: actuarial, social and political. Proliferation of rules and regulations in the aftermath of a major disaster can be as much, if not more, the product of political risk aversion as it is of social and actuarial assessments. ‘Smart’ regulation, which aims to reduce risk while avoiding an excess of rules, must address all three dimensions. The paper explores when and how there can be a ‘smart’ response to major disaster.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1837
ISSN: 1325-3387
Appears in Collections:April 2008

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Haines & Sutton & Phung jaa.pdf308.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback