Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons

Flinders Academic Commons >
Research Flagships, Centres and Institutes >
Flinders Centre for Ophthalmology, Eye and Vision Research >
Konrad Pesudovs >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1859

Title: Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes [post print]
Authors: Pesudovs, Konrad
Caudle, Lynda Elisabeth
Rees, Guy
Lamoureux, Ecosse L
Keywords: Visually impaired persons
Outcome assessment (health care)
Activities of daily living
Issue Date: Jun-2008
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Pesudovs K, Caudle LE, Rees G, Lamoureux EL. 2008 Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes. 'Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery' 34(6) pp. 925-933
Abstract: PURPOSE: To test the validity of the Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire in a cataract population. SETTING: Flinders Eye Centre, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia. METHODS: Cataract patients recruited from a hospital waiting list completed the IVI questionnaire. The scale was assessed for fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality, item and person fit to the model, response category performance, differential item functioning (whether different subgroups responded differently), and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, the IVI questionnaire performed well; there were ordered thresholds, person separation reliability was 0.97, and it was free from differential item functioning. One item (worry about eyesight getting worse) misfit the model and was removed. There was evidence of multidimensionality, indicating that the overall IVI score should be discarded; however, the 3 subscales (reading and accessing information, mobility and independence, and emotional well-being) functioned well. Several items calibrated differently in cataract patients compared with low-vision patients, indicating different issues are important to each population and that there is a need for population-specific conversion algorithms. Targeting of the IVI items was biased toward more impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 subscales of the IVI questionnaire functioned well in a cataract population. However, additional items targeting the less impaired patients, especially second-eye cataract patients, would improve measurement.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/1859
ISSN: 0886-3350
Appears in Collections:Konrad Pesudovs

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
validity.pdf187.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback