Flinders Academic Commons >
Research Flagships, Centres and Institutes >
National Institute of Labour Studies >
Australian Bulletin of Labour >
Vol. 37 No. 1 2011 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Did 'Work First' Work? The Role of Employment Assistance Programs in Reducing Long-term Unemployment in Australia (1990-2008)|
|Authors: ||Davidson, P.|
|Issue Date: ||2011|
|Publisher: ||National Institute of Labour Studies|
|Citation: ||Davidson, P. 2011. Did 'Work First' Work? The Role of Employment Assistance Programs in Reducing Long-term Unemployment in Australia (1990-2008). Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp.51-96.|
|Abstract: ||Over the last two decades Australia's progress in reducing its long-term reliance on unemployment payments was disappointing; this was despite an improving labour market, tighter work requirements and reformed employment assistance. After the introduction of the Job Network in 1998, the focus of employment assistance for long-term unemployed people shifted from a human capital approach towards a 'work first' approach. We review evidence from microeconomic evaluations of employment programs. Generally, job search assistance - central to work first - is relatively effective. Gaps in the research may be a reason for the apparent discrepancy between these findings and Australia's slow progress overall in reducing long-term reliance on unemployment payments. Short-term average measures mask the distribution of program outcomes and results over the longer term. As unemployment fell, a growing proportion of unemployment payment recipients were disadvantaged in the labour market, and the work first approach may be ineffective for this group. The paper concludes with a brief assessment of the Job Services Australia program.|
|Appears in Collections:||Vol. 37 No. 1 2011|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.