|
Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
Education >
Education - Collected Works >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26039
|
| Title: | The fallacy of availability |
| Authors: | Jewell, Paul Damian |
| Keywords: | Thought Reasoning Problem-solving |
| Issue Date: | 2001 |
| Publisher: | Korean Association for Thinking Development |
| Citation: | Jewell, P., 2001. The fallacy of availability. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem-Solving, 11(1), 5-12. |
| Abstract: | I propose to identify and describe an example of fallacious reasoning which I call
the Fallacy of Availability. References to such a fallacy do not appear in standard
lists of fallacies. Once alerted to it, however, critical thinkers will readily think of
examples. The fallacious reasoning occurs when a “remedy” for a problem is
adopted or proposed on the grounds that the remedy is seen to be available rather
than considered to be efficacious. The practice of critically reading argumentative
passages with a view to identifying and classifying fallacies has, quite rightly, lost
favour in recent years as a core exercise in thinking and critical reasoning courses.
In its place the construction (as opposed to deconstruction) of chains of reasoning
is preferable. To this end, however, it is useful for advanced thinkers to be aware
of effective reasoning techniques and of inferior, ineffective substitutes. The Fallacy
of Availability is a case of inferior, ineffective reasoning. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26039 |
| ISSN: | 1225-3111 1598-723X |
| Appears in Collections: | Education - Collected Works
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|