|
Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
National Institute of Labour Studies >
NILS Working Papers >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26070
|
| Title: | NILS Working paper no. 168. Enterprise bargaining and productivity |
| Authors: | Hancock, Keith Jackson |
| Keywords: | Industrial relations Wages Productivity Labour |
| Issue Date: | 2011 |
| Publisher: | National Institute of Labour Studies |
| Citation: | Hancock, K. 2011. Enterprise bargaining and productivity. Working Paper No 168/2011 |
| Series/Report no.: | NILS Working Paper Series;No. 168/2011 |
| Abstract: | There can be no certainty about the productivity effects of enterprise
bargaining, because the counterfactual situation is and will remain unknown. That said, I
contend that there are good grounds for doubting that enterprise bargaining contributed much,
if anything, to productivity; still less to ongoing productivity growth. These grounds are:
1. At most, there was a four-year boost in productivity whose timing does
conceivably match the introduction and spread of enterprise bargaining. The boost
has not endured.
2. If the four-year boost was policy-induced, there were other changes of policy in
the late 1980s and early 1990s that may have been more important than the shift to
enterprise bargaining.
3. When the productivity data are dissected to the industry level, it is hard to identify
any large movements in productivity that could reasonably be ascribed to
enterprise bargaining. Wholesale trade is a possible exception. The records of
some major industries, notably mining and electricity, gas and water, suggest that
much stronger influences have been at work. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26070 |
| Appears in Collections: | NILS Working Papers
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|