|
Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
National Institute of Labour Studies >
Australian Bulletin of Labour >
Vol. 38 No. 3 2012 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382
|
| Title: | Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility? |
| Authors: | Heron, A Charlesworth, S |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| Publisher: | National Institute of Labour Studies |
| Citation: | Heron, A. and Charlesworth, S., 2012. Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility? Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 214-233. |
| Abstract: | Since the Labor Government’s election in 2007, debate around working-time
flexibility has continued unabated. Employers argue that increasing employer-orientated
flexibility through changes to minimum working-time standards
and individual flexibility agreements is the path to enhanced productivity
and a more effective economy. Unions and others have focused on the need
for greater employee-orientated flexibility to facilitate combining work and
care. However, on neither side of the debate has much attention been paid
to basic principles that might inform working-time regulation in ways that
would enable individual workers to manage their work and care responsibilities
better and deliver a more sustainable and gender-equitable economy. The
article outlines recent contestation around flexibility and argues that without
ensuring adequate minimum working-time standards for all workers, the
gendered divide around work and care will continue to be reinforced. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382 |
| ISSN: | 0311-6336 |
| Appears in Collections: | Vol. 38 No. 3 2012
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|