Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons
 

Flinders Academic Commons >
Flinders Digital Archive >
School of Medicine >
Palliative and Supportive Services >
Ruth Sladek >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/2953

Title: Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines
Authors: Sladek, Ruth
Bond, Malcolm James
Huynh, Luan
Chew, Derek Peng
Phillips, Paddy Andrew
Keywords: Cognition
Decision Making
Medical Staff, Hospital
Guideline Adherence
Coronary Disease
Issue Date: 25-Apr-2008
Publisher: BioMed Central - http://www.biomedcentral.com
Citation: Sladek R., Bond M., Huynh L.T., Chew D.P.B. and Phillips P.A. 2008 Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines Implementation Science, 3:23
Abstract: Background How humans think and make decisions is important in understanding behaviour. Hence an understanding of cognitive processes among physicians may inform our understanding of behaviour in relation to evidence implementation strategies. A personality theory, Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory (CEST) proposes a relationship between different ways of thinking and behaviour, and articulates pathways for behaviour change. However prior to the empirical testing of interventions based on CEST, it is first necessary to demonstrate its suitability among a sample of healthcare workers. Objectives To investigate the relationship between thinking styles and the knowledge and clinical practices of doctors directly involved in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Methods Self-reported doctors' thinking styles (N = 74) were correlated with results from a survey investigating knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice, and evaluated against recently published acute coronary syndrome clinical guidelines. Results Guideline-discordant practice was associated with an experiential style of thinking. Conversely, guideline-concordant practice was associated with a higher preference for a rational style of reasoning. Conclusion Findings support that while guidelines might be necessary to communicate evidence, other strategies may be necessary to target discordant behaviours. Further research designed to examine the relationships found in the current study is required.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/2953
ISSN: 1748-5908
Appears in Collections:Ruth Sladek

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Sladek2.pdf238.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback