Flinders University Flinders Academic Commons
 

Flinders Academic Commons >
Research Flagships, Centres and Institutes >
Flinders Centre for Ophthalmology, Eye and Vision Research >
Konrad Pesudovs >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8028

Title: Validity of the Adaptation to Age-related Vision Loss Scale in an Australian Cataract Population
Authors: Gothwal, Vijaya
Wright, Thomas
Lamoureux, Ecosse L
Pesudovs, Konrad
Keywords: Vision loss
Cataracts
Rasch analysis
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Spanish Council of Optometry
Citation: Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL and Pesudovs K.(2009) Validity of the Adaptation to Age-related Vision Loss Scale in an Australian Cataract Population. Journal of Optometry, 2(3)p.142-147
Abstract: Purpose: The Adaptation to Age-related Vision Loss (AVL) scale was developed to measure the adjustment of older adults who are adapting to late-life vision loss. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the AVL scale satisfies the Rasch model in a cataract population. Methods: The 24-item AVL scale (18 negatively and 6 positively coded) was mailed to 436 cataract patients for self-administration whilst they were on the waiting list for cataract surgery at the Flinders Eye Centre, Adelaide, South Australia. Rasch analysis was performed to determine whether the items were measuring a single construct (unidimensionality) as examined with fit statistics and principal components analysis (PCA) of the residuals. The ability of the scale to distinguish between the levels of adaptation of the participants (person separation) was investigated, with a value ≥ 2.0 established as the minimum acceptable. Results: The AVL scale was unable to differentiate sufficiently between participants’ levels of adaptation, indicating poor person separation. One item did not fit the construct, causing misfit. Furthermore, the five positively worded items did not appear either to measure the same construct as other items, resulting in lack of unidimensionality evidenced by PCA. Following the deletion of these items, the AVL scale was one-dimensional but a single item continued to misfit, so it had to be deleted, resulting in an 18-item AVL scale. Even so, the discriminating abilities of the scale continued to be poor. Conclusions: The AVL scale is not an appropriate measure of adaptation to vision loss in a cataract population.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/8028
ISSN: 1989-1342
Appears in Collections:Konrad Pesudovs

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Validity_of_the_adaptation(published_version).pdf174.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback