Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStein, Ken
dc.contributor.authorDyer, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMilne, Ruairidh
dc.contributor.authorRound, Alison
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, John
dc.contributor.authorCrabb, Tania
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-27T06:30:24Z
dc.date.available2010-07-27T06:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.citationStein, K., Dyer, M.E., Crabb, T., Milne, R., Round, A., Ratcliffe, J., & Brazier, J., 2006. A pilot Internet 'Value of Health' Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(90), 1-11.en
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/11958
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.hqlo.com/content/4/1/90
dc.description.abstractObjectives To pilot using a panel of members of the public to provide preference data via the Internet Methods A stratified random sample of members of the general public was recruited and familiarised with the standard gamble procedure using an Internet based tool. Health states were perdiodically presented in "sets" corresponding to different conditions, during the study. The following were described: Recruitment (proportion of people approached who were trained); Participation (a) the proportion of people trained who provided any preferences and (b) the proportion of panel members who contributed to each "set" of values; and Compliance (the proportion, per participant, of preference tasks which were completed). The influence of covariates on these outcomes was investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results A panel of 112 people was recruited. 23% of those approached (n = 5,320) responded to the invitation, and 24% of respondents (n = 1,215) were willing to participate (net = 5.5%). However, eventual recruitment rates, following training, were low (2.1% of those approached). Recruitment from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities was low. Eighteen sets of health state descriptions were considered over 14 months. 74% of panel members carried out at least one valuation task. People from areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation and unmarried people were less likely to participate. An average of 41% of panel members expressed preferences on each set of descriptions. Compliance ranged from 3% to 100%. Conclusion It is feasible to establish a panel of members of the general public to express preferences on a wide range of health state descriptions using the Internet, although differential recruitment and attrition are important challenges. Particular attention to recruitment and retention in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities is necessary. Nevertheless, the panel approach to preference measurement using the Internet offers the potential to provide specific utility data in a responsive manner for use in economic evaluations and to address some of the outstanding methodological uncertainties in this field.
dc.titleA pilot Internet 'Value of Health' Panel: recruitment, participation and complianceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.rmid2006015517
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-90
dc.subject.forgroup1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.subject.forgroup1199 Other Medical and Health Sciencesen
dc.rights.licenseIn Copyright


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record