Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBell, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-08T02:36:23Z
dc.date.available2008-04-08T02:36:23Z
dc.date.issued2002-06
dc.identifier.citationBell, Richard 2002. Silver Mysteries. Review of "Patrick White and Alchemy" by James Bulman-May. 'Australian Book Review', No 242, June/July, 43-44.en
dc.identifier.issn0155-2864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/1806
dc.description.abstractBulman-May’s goal is to show that the major novels are in fact comprehensively based on this particular branch of medieval enquiry. Now, given that none of the biographical material indicates that White had any particular interest in alchemy, the reader may be forgiven for approaching this book with a degree of scepticism. I suspect that White, if he was still alive (and cared enough), would probably dismiss it as so much academic pseudointellectualism, just as he objected to David Tacey’s Jungian approach in "Patrick White: Fiction and the Unconscious" (1988) on the grounds that it restricted his novels to a particular frame of reference, and that he (White) had not even read Jung until he came to write "The Solid Mandala". Like Tacey and Watson before him, Bulman-May could respond with the ‘universal impulse’ defence: alchemical principles are submerged in the universal unconscious, and emerge from time to time in the work of outstanding artists.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAustralian Book Reviewen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNo 242en
dc.subjectBook reviewen
dc.subjectLiterary criticismen
dc.titleSilver Mysteries. "Patrick White and Alchemy", by James Bulman-May. [review]en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record