Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPesudovs, Konrad
dc.contributor.authorCaudle, Lynda Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorRees, Guy
dc.contributor.authorLamoureux, Ecosse L
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-30T05:19:21Z
dc.date.available2008-05-30T05:19:21Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.identifier.citationPesudovs K, Caudle LE, Rees G, Lamoureux EL. 2008 Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes. 'Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery' 34(6) pp. 925-933en
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/1859
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To test the validity of the Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire in a cataract population. SETTING: Flinders Eye Centre, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia. METHODS: Cataract patients recruited from a hospital waiting list completed the IVI questionnaire. The scale was assessed for fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality, item and person fit to the model, response category performance, differential item functioning (whether different subgroups responded differently), and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, the IVI questionnaire performed well; there were ordered thresholds, person separation reliability was 0.97, and it was free from differential item functioning. One item (worry about eyesight getting worse) misfit the model and was removed. There was evidence of multidimensionality, indicating that the overall IVI score should be discarded; however, the 3 subscales (reading and accessing information, mobility and independence, and emotional well-being) functioned well. Several items calibrated differently in cataract patients compared with low-vision patients, indicating different issues are important to each population and that there is a need for population-specific conversion algorithms. Targeting of the IVI items was biased toward more impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 subscales of the IVI questionnaire functioned well in a cataract population. However, additional items targeting the less impaired patients, especially second-eye cataract patients, would improve measurement.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectVisually impaired personsen
dc.subjectOutcome assessment (health care)en
dc.subjectActivities of daily livingen
dc.subject.otherAustralian Standard Research Classification 321016 Ophthalmology and Vision Scienceen
dc.titleValidity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes [post print]en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.relation.grantnumberNHMRC/264620en
dc.relation.grantnumberNHMRC/426765en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record