Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Niki
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, Alison
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorBattersby, Malcolm Wayne
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-08T04:25:06Z
dc.date.available2012-11-08T04:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationEllis, N., MacKenzie, A., McLeod, R. and Battersby, M., 2011. Disempowerment of workers in vocational rehabilitation: would self-management help? Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 27(3), 171-184.en
dc.identifier.issn1837-9362
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/26486
dc.description.abstractThis case study is a sub-study to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of adding self-management training to usual vocational rehabilitation for chronic, compensated musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this sub-study was to assess overlap and differences between vocational rehabilitation and self-management as it is currently practised in Australia. Analysis of high-level policy and procedure documents, key informant interviews and an audit of seven case files using an adapted tool for assessing the principles of self-management were conducted. Results showed that payer influence is high in the determination of service delivery models and that vocational rehabilitation as practised in Australia currently does not embrace the principles of self-management.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCCH Australia Ltden
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.subjectSelf-managementen
dc.subjectVocational rehabilitationen
dc.titleDisempowerment of workers in vocational rehabilitation: would self-management help?en
dc.typeArticleen
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupBattersby, Malcolm Wayne: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-5591en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record