Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Joanne M
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Carlene J
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Vivienne M
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Tess Anne
dc.contributor.authorFlight, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Graeme Paul
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-06T07:03:15Z
dc.date.available2013-08-06T07:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.citationOsborne, J. , Wilson, C. , Moore, V. , Gregory, T. , Flight, I. and Young, G., 2012. Sample preference for colorectal cancer screening tests: blood or stool? Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2, 326-331.en
dc.identifier.issn2162-2477
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/26909
dc.description.abstractObjective: Despite the high prevalence of CRC and the proven benefits of faecal sampling tests, participation rates in CRC screening are suboptimal. Literature has identified a number of barriers to participation, including faecal aversion. Emerging test technologies suggest blood-based molecular markers might provide an alternative, more acceptable option, for CRC screening tests. We aim to determine preference for blood compared to faeces as the sample for the screening test. Methods: A survey was mailed to 956 South Australians aged 50 to 74 years. Data were collected on sample preference, demographic variables, and ratings of screening test convenience and comfort. Results: The survey yielded a 43% response rate. The majority of participants preferred to provide a blood sample (78% v 22%, p < 0.001). Women were more likely to prefer blood than men (82% vs 74%, p = 0.05). Sample experience influenced preferences, with a significantly higher preference for faeces among participants with experience in faecal sampling (27% vs 17% with no experience, p < 0.05). Participants who preferred to provide a faecal sample rated it significantly more convenient (p < 0.001), more comfortable (p < 0.001), and more acceptable (p < 0.001) than those who preferred blood sampling. Conclusions: Survey participants overwhelmingly indicate a preference for the idea of a blood sample over a faecal sample for CRC screening. Preference was influenced by gender, experience with sampling method and the individual’s perception of sampling convenience, sampling comfort and sample acceptability. Our results suggest population participation rates are likely to improve with blood-based screening tests.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Health & Medical Research Councilen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherScientific Research Publishingen
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1006242en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributions Non-Commercial Share Alike Licenseen
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.subjectBowel cancer screeningen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.titleSample preference for colorectal cancer screening tests: blood or stool?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.relation.grantnumberNHMRC/1006242en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2012.23047en
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2012 SciRes.en
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-SA
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupWilson, Carlene J: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-4690en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record