Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSladek, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorBond, Malcolm James
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Luan
dc.contributor.authorChew, Derek Peng
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Paddy Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-01T01:36:17Z
dc.date.available2008-08-01T01:36:17Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-25
dc.identifier.citationSladek R., Bond M., Huynh L.T., Chew D.P.B. and Phillips P.A. 2008 Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines Implementation Science, 3:23en
dc.identifier.issn1748-5908
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/2953
dc.description.abstractBackground How humans think and make decisions is important in understanding behaviour. Hence an understanding of cognitive processes among physicians may inform our understanding of behaviour in relation to evidence implementation strategies. A personality theory, Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory (CEST) proposes a relationship between different ways of thinking and behaviour, and articulates pathways for behaviour change. However prior to the empirical testing of interventions based on CEST, it is first necessary to demonstrate its suitability among a sample of healthcare workers. Objectives To investigate the relationship between thinking styles and the knowledge and clinical practices of doctors directly involved in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Methods Self-reported doctors' thinking styles (N = 74) were correlated with results from a survey investigating knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice, and evaluated against recently published acute coronary syndrome clinical guidelines. Results Guideline-discordant practice was associated with an experiential style of thinking. Conversely, guideline-concordant practice was associated with a higher preference for a rational style of reasoning. Conclusion Findings support that while guidelines might be necessary to communicate evidence, other strategies may be necessary to target discordant behaviours. Further research designed to examine the relationships found in the current study is required.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central - http://www.biomedcentral.comen
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectMedical Staff, Hospital
dc.subjectGuideline Adherence
dc.subjectCoronary Disease
dc.titleThinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelinesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupSladek, Ruth: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-2528en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record