Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeatty, Lisa Jane
dc.contributor.authorBinnion, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T05:34:31Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T05:34:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-08
dc.identifier.citationBeatty L, Binnion C. A Systematic Review of Predictors of, and Reasons for, Adherence to Online Psychological Interventions. Int J Behav Med. 2016 Mar 8.[Epub ahead of print]en
dc.identifier.issn1070-5503
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/36110
dc.descriptionThis author manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from the date of publication (March 8 2016) in accordance with publisher copyright policy. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9.en
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: A key issue regarding the provision of psychological therapy in a self-guided online format is low rates of adherence. The aim of this systematic review was to assess both quantitative and qualitative data on the predictors of adherence, as well as participant reported reasons for adhering or not adhering to online psychological interventions. METHODS: Database searches of PsycINFO, Medline, and CINAHL identified 1721 potentially relevant articles published between 1 January 2000 and 25 November 2015. A further 34 potentially relevant articles were retrieved from reference lists. Articles that reported predictors of, or reasons for, adherence to an online psychological intervention were included. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Predictors assessed included demographic, psychological, characteristics of presenting problem, and intervention/computer-related predictors. Evidence suggested that female gender, higher treatment expectancy, sufficient time, and personalized intervention content each predicted higher adherence. Age, baseline symptom severity, and control group allocation had mixed findings. The majority of assessed variables however, did not predict adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Few clear predictors of adherence emerged overall, and most results were either mixed or too preliminary to draw conclusions. More research of predictors associated with adherence to online interventions is warranted.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1042942en
dc.rightsCopyright © International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016en
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Predictors of, and Reasons for, Adherence to Online Psychological Interventions.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.relation.grantnumberNHMRC/1042942en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9en
dc.rights.holderInternational Society of Behavioral Medicineen
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupBeatty, Lisa Jane: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-8452en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record