Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: its importance and a framework
MetadataShow full item record
Background: The adverse health and equity impacts of transnational corporations’ (TNCs) practices have become central public health concerns as TNCs increasingly dominate global trade and investment and shape national economies. Despite this, methodologies have been lacking with which to study the health equity impacts of individual corporations and thus to inform actions to mitigate or reverse negative and increase positive impacts. Methods: This paper reports on a framework designed to conduct corporate health impact assessment (CHIA), developed at a meeting held at the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center in May 2015. Results: On the basis of the deliberations at the meeting it was recommended that the CHIA should be based on ex post assessment and follow the standard HIA steps of screening, scoping, identification, assessment, decision-making and recommendations. A framework to conduct the CHIA was developed and designed to be applied to a TNC’s practices internationally, and within countries to enable comparison of practices and health impacts in different settings. The meeting participants proposed that impacts should be assessed according to the TNC’s global and national operating context; its organisational structure, political and business practices (including the type, distribution and marketing of its products); and workforce and working conditions, social factors, the environment, consumption patterns, and economic conditions within countries. Conclusion: We anticipate that the results of the CHIA will be used by civil society for capacity building and advocacy purposes, by governments to inform regulatory decision-making, and by TNCs to lessen their negative health impacts on health and fulfil commitments made to corporate social responsibility.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Challenging Institutional Norms to Improve Local-Level Policy for Health and Health Equity. Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups” Fisher, Matthew (Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 2018-08-04)The article by Susanne Hagen and colleagues on Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway discusses actions by municipal governments to assess and address heath inequities within their respective regions, as required under ...
The rhetoric and reality of e-health: a critical assessment of the benefits of e-health in primary health care Newman, Lareen Ann; Frank, Oliver (CSIRO Publishing, 2013-11-18)In developing the special issue, a number of things have been foremost in our mind. Firstly, what exactly is e-health, and is it different from telehealth, ICT for health, online health and other terms? The WHO defines ...
Context matters for primary health care access: a multi-method comparative study of contextual influences on health service access arrangements across models of primary health care Ward, Bernadette; Lane, Riki; McDonald, Julie; Powell-Davies, Gawaine; Fuller, Jeffrey; Dennis, Sarah; Kearns, Rachael; Russell, Grant (BioMed Central, 2018-06-15)Abstract Background Equitable access to primary health care (PHC) is an important component of integrated chronic disease management. Whilst context is known to influence ...