Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoutsen, M
dc.contributor.authorGraycar, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-12T23:12:31Z
dc.date.available2017-04-12T23:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2012-10
dc.identifier.citationJoutsen, M., & Graycar, A. (2012). When Experts and Diplomats Agree: Negotiating Peer Review of the UN Convention Against Corruption. Global Governance, 18(4), 425-439.en
dc.identifier.issn1075-2846
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/37152
dc.descriptionGlobal Governance, vol. 18, no. 4. Copyright © 2012 by Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. Used with permission of the publisher.en
dc.description.abstractThe UN Convention Against Corruption is the only truly global convention in corruption control. Separate and rather difficult negotiations were con­ducted on a mechanism for the implementation of the treaty. These ne­gotiations broke ground by providing, for the first time, peer review of a United Nations treaty. This article, which is based on the authors' close ob­servations and interviews with key participants, seeks to show how the dy­namics between technical experts and diplomats led to a resolution that would not have occurred if either the technical experts or the diplomats had acted alone. KEYWORDS: corruption, peer review, United Nations, ne­gotiation impasse, experts, diplomats.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.en
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 by Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.en
dc.subjectUN Convention Against Corruptionen
dc.subjectcorruptionen
dc.subjecttreatyen
dc.subjectpeer reviewen
dc.titleWhen Experts and Diplomats Agree: Negotiating Peer Review of the UN Convention Against Corruptionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holderLynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record