Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study
L'Abbe, Mary R
MetadataShow full item record
Nutrient profiling (NP) is a method for evaluating the healthfulness of foods. Although many NP models exist, most have not been validated. This study aimed to examine the content and construct/convergent validity of five models from different regions: Australia/New Zealand (FSANZ), France (Nutri-Score), Canada (HCST), Europe (EURO) and Americas (PAHO). Using data from the 2013 UofT Food Label Information Program (n15342 foods/beverages), construct/convergent validity was assessed by comparing the classifications of foods determined by each model to a previously validated model, which served as the reference (Ofcom). The parameters assessed included associations (Cochran–Armitage trend test), agreement (κ statistic) and discordant classifications (McNemar’s test). Analyses were conducted across all foods and by food category. On the basis of the nutrients/components considered by each model, all models exhibited moderate content validity. Although positive associations were observed between each model and Ofcom (all Ptrend<0·001), agreement with Ofcom was ‘near perfect’ for FSANZ (κ=0·89) and Nutri-Score (κ=0·83), ‘moderate’ for EURO (κ=0·54) and ‘fair’ for PAHO (κ=0·28) and HCST (κ=0·26). There were discordant classifications with Ofcom for 5·3 % (FSANZ), 8·3 % (Nutri-Score), 22·0 % (EURO), 33·4 % (PAHO) and 37·0 % (HCST) of foods (all P<0·001). Construct/convergent validity was confirmed between FSANZ and Nutri-Score v. Ofcom, and to a lesser extent between EURO v. Ofcom. Numerous incongruencies with Ofcom were identified for HCST and PAHO, which highlights the importance of examining classifications across food categories, the level at which differences between models become apparent. These results may be informative for regulators seeking to adapt and validate existing models for use in country-specific applications.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The internal consistency and construct validity of the Partners in Health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure Harvey, Peter William; Petkov, John; Battersby, Malcolm Wayne (2010)
The internal consistency and construct validity of the Partners in Health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure Petkov, John; Harvey, Peter William; Battersby, Malcolm Wayne (Springer Science + Business Media, 2010)The purpose of this study was to test the internal consistency and construct validity of the revised 12-item self-rated Partners in Health (PIH) scale used to assess patients' chronic condition self-management knowledge ...
A knowledge questionnaire on amphetamine related problems: assessing the conceptual validity of the scale, and the implications of the method for informing teaching and student learning Shoobridge, Jodie (Flinders University, 2001-07)Whilst knowledge and attitude scales are frequently used evaluation 'tools' in the alcohol and other drug field, rarely do reports exist regarding the conceptual coherence or statistical validity of instruments in common ...