STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation
View/
Date
2019-01-15Author
Bright, Jo-Anne
Cheng, Kevin
McGovern, Catherine
Kelly, Hannah
Moretti, Tamyra R
Smith, Michael A
Bieber, Frederick R
Budowle, Bruce
Coble, Michael D
Alghafri, Rashed
Allen, Paul Stafford
Barber, Amy
Beamer, Vickie
Buettner, Christina
Russell, Melanie
Gehrig, Christian
Hicks, Tacha
Charak, Jessica
Cheong-Wing, Kate
Ciecko, Anne
Davis, Christie T
Donley, Michael
Pedersen, Natalie
Gartside, Bill
Granger, Dominic
Greer-Ritzheimer, Mary Margaret
Reisinger, Erick
Kennedy, Jarrah
Grammer, Erin
Kaplan, Maria
Hansen, David
Larsen, Hans J
Laureano, Alanna
Li, Christina
Lien, Eugene
Lindberg, Emilia
Kelly, Ciara
Mallinder, Ben
Malsom, Simon
Yacovone-Margetts, Alyse
McWhorter, Andrew
Prajapati, Sapana M
Powell, Tamar
Shutler, Gary
Stevenson, Kate
Stonehouse, April R
Smith, Lindsey
Murakami, Julie
Halsing, Eric
Wright, Darren
Clark, Leigh
Taylor, Duncan A
Buckleton, John
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In forensic DNA analysis there is valid interest in the reliability of the interpretation reported. Reliability, in part but not fully, relates to the scientific concepts of repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy. Before attempting to address repeatability and reproducibility, and the challenge in context of determining accuracy in context, we give a brief summary of the current process that leads to the reported result.
Description
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (January 2019) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy